FundedNext vs FTMO: Rules, Profit Splits & Platform Comparison (2025)

When choosing between FundedNext and FTMO, the decision largely depends on your trading style, goals, and preferences. Both are top proprietary trading firms but differ in their rules, profit splits, and evaluation processes. Here’s a quick breakdown:

• FundedNext focuses on flexibility and fast account scaling. It offers multiple challenge models, profit sharing during evaluation (15%), and higher profit splits (up to 95%). It supports CFDs and Futures trading and provides fast payouts (within 24 hours).
• FTMO emphasizes structure and trader development. It uses a consistent two-step evaluation process, starts with an 80% profit split (scalable to 90%), and offers lower upfront fees. FTMO supports CFDs only and processes payouts in 1-2 business days.

Quick Comparison:

If you prefer flexibility, faster scaling, and higher profit splits, FundedNext might be the better fit. If you value structure, consistency, and lower initial fees, FTMO could be the right choice. Both offer strong options for traders, but the best platform will depend on your trading experience and strategy.

FTMO Vs FundedNext? I Got Paid by Both – Here’s My Honest Review.

Company Overviews

Understanding the backgrounds of these companies sheds light on their unique approaches to trader evaluation. Both have established distinct identities within the proprietary trading industry, shaped by the business cultures and regulations of their respective home countries.

FundedNext Overview

Headquartered in Ajman, United Arab Emirates, FundedNext entered the scene in 2022 and quickly gained traction with its forward-thinking strategies. Despite being a newer player, the company has expanded its reach significantly, operating in regions like Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Cyprus, and Malaysia. This global presence allows FundedNext to cater to traders across various time zones and regulatory frameworks.

FundedNext is driven by the motto "For every trader, every market," highlighting its commitment to inclusivity and diversity in trading. The company prioritizes three key areas: transforming traders’ lives, offering robust educational resources, and contributing to the broader trading ecosystem. These principles are evident in their funding models, which include 1-Step, 2-Step, Instant Funding, and specialized options like Rapid and Legacy for Futures trading.

What sets FundedNext apart is its dual-market focus, offering challenges for both CFDs and Futures markets, giving traders a broader range of opportunities compared to many competitors. Additionally, the company employs an aggressive scaling model, increasing account sizes by 40% for traders who perform well. This approach reflects their focus on flexibility and market diversity.

FTMO Overview

Established in 2015 and headquartered in Prague, Czech Republic, FTMO has a longer history in the industry. Originally launched under the name "Získej účet" (Get an Account), the company has spent nearly a decade building a reputation for consistency, transparency, and structured trader development.

FTMO primarily focuses on the CFD market, offering a wide range of instruments, including stocks. While its market coverage is narrower compared to FundedNext, FTMO compensates with a deeper and more specialized approach to CFDs.

A standout feature of FTMO is its dedication to education. The company supports traders through its structured Trading Academy and personalized coaching programs for funded traders. This emphasis on education showcases their long-term commitment to developing skilled traders rather than solely allocating capital.

FTMO’s evaluation process follows a standardized two-step structure that has remained unchanged over the years. This consistency appeals to traders looking for clear benchmarks and predictable processes. Compared to FundedNext’s innovation-driven model, FTMO focuses on a systematic and education-centric strategy.

The contrasting approaches – FundedNext’s rapid, multi-market expansion and FTMO’s established, education-focused framework – shape their trading rules and the support they offer to traders.

Challenge Rules & Evaluation Process

The evaluation methods of FundedNext and FTMO reflect distinct philosophies when it comes to assessing traders. Both platforms require an upfront fee, refundable upon successful completion, but their challenge designs, profit-sharing models, and fee policies differ considerably. These differences shape the experience traders can expect from each platform.

FundedNext Challenge Rules

FundedNext offers multiple challenge models, such as Legacy and Rapid, tailored to different trading styles and risk levels. These models are available for both CFD and Futures markets. Notably, FundedNext stands out by offering 15% profit sharing during the evaluation phase, helping reduce traders’ risks.

For a $100,000 account, the entry fee is $549.99, which is refundable after the first profitable withdrawal. Smaller accounts are also available, starting at just $59.99 for a $6,000 evaluation account.

Traders who need to restart their evaluation can take advantage of discounted reset fees. For example, as of September 23, 2025, there’s a 12% discount on reset fees for Futures Challenges. The reset fee for a $100,000 Rapid account is $219.99, down from the original $249.99.

FundedNext also avoids imposing consistency requirements, making it a suitable option for swing traders or those using longer-term strategies.

FTMO Challenge Rules

FTMO follows a fixed two-step structure with specific benchmarks that traders must meet. The company charges a single, refundable fee that covers both phases of the evaluation. For a $100,000 account, the fee is approximately €540 (around $580–600, depending on exchange rates).

Unlike FundedNext, FTMO does not offer profit sharing during the evaluation phase. Traders must successfully complete both steps before they can start earning profits from their trading performance. Additionally, FTMO emphasizes consistent performance, discouraging traders from relying on isolated large gains.

FTMO requires traders to pay the full fee for resets, which can increase costs for those needing multiple attempts.

Comparison Table

Ultimately, the choice between FundedNext and FTMO depends on a trader’s goals, experience, and preferences. FundedNext’s profit-sharing model and flexible rules make it appealing for those looking to earn during the evaluation phase. On the other hand, FTMO’s structured approach and focus on consistency may attract traders who value clear benchmarks before they start earning.

Profit Splits & Payouts

FundedNext and FTMO differ significantly when it comes to profit splits and payout processes, which can directly impact your earnings and cash flow.

FundedNext Profit Splits

FundedNext offers some of the most generous profit splits in the industry, allowing traders to keep up to 95% of their profits on CFD accounts. The exact percentage depends on the challenge model you select and whether you qualify for account scaling.

Most traders start with a profit split of 80-90%, but this can increase through FundedNext’s Scale-Up program. This program boosts account sizes by 40% every four months, potentially reaching an impressive $4 million.

One of FundedNext’s standout features is its fast payout process. They guarantee to process performance rewards within 24 hours of your request. If they miss this deadline, they compensate with an additional $1,000.

"You can receive your performance reward within 24 hours of requesting it. If there’s ever a delay, FundedNext adds $1,000 extra. Rewards are processed in just five hours."

For CFD traders, the first payout can be requested after 10 trading days, with subsequent payouts available bi-weekly or monthly. Futures traders, on the other hand, can receive payouts within 24 hours after the initial period. Traders should note that transfer gateway charges apply, and the minimum withdrawal amounts are $100 for CFDs and $250-$500 for futures accounts.

FTMO Profit Splits

FTMO uses a structured profit split model that starts at 80% and can increase to 90% for traders who qualify for their scaling program. The scaling program allows account growth of 25% every four months, with a maximum scaled capital of $2 million. To qualify, traders must achieve at least 10% total net profit over four months, complete at least two payouts, and maintain a positive account balance.

FTMO’s payout processing time is also competitive, taking 1-2 business days after invoice confirmation.

"The withdrawals are processed within 1-2 business days upon confirming the invoice."

Traders must wait at least 14 days from their first trading day to request their initial payout. After this period, payouts can be requested on demand. FTMO does not charge additional withdrawal fees, and the minimum withdrawal amounts are $20 for bank transfers and $50 for cryptocurrency withdrawals.

Comparison Table

Here’s a quick breakdown of the key differences:

When deciding between these platforms, it often comes down to your priorities. FundedNext is ideal for traders who value higher profit splits and fast payouts with guaranteed processing times. On the other hand, FTMO offers a more structured approach with no withdrawal fees and lower minimum withdrawal amounts, making it a solid option for those seeking predictability and cost efficiency.

Platform Features & Trading Tools

FundedNext and FTMO both provide robust platform support, but they differ in the variety of platforms they offer and the unique features tailored to enhance user experience.

Supported Platforms and Tools

FundedNext stands out by supporting four trading platforms: MetaTrader 4 (MT4), MetaTrader 5 (MT5), cTrader, and Match-Trader. Additionally, it offers TradingView for market analysis, although this is limited to analysis purposes only.

"FundedNext is one of the very few prop firms that offer both MT4 and MT5 at the same time. Most companies provide only one, but we give traders the freedom to choose between both platforms, which provides a competitive advantage."

FundedNext holds main-level licenses for MT4 and MT5, a rare feature among prop firms. Current usage statistics reveal that MT5 is the most popular platform (64.93%), followed by MT4 (19.01%), cTrader (9.19%), and Match-Trader (6.87%).

"FundedNext proudly holds main-level licenses for both MT4 and MT5. This highlights the stability and scalability of our operations. Very few prop firms own main-level licenses, which puts FundedNext a step ahead in terms of reliability."

FTMO, on the other hand, offers a more streamlined selection of platforms, including MT4, MT5, DXtrade, and cTrader. While FundedNext provides detailed descriptions of each platform to guide traders, FTMO focuses on meeting core trading needs.

FundedNext’s platform options cater to different trading styles:

• MT4: Known for its simplicity and wide adoption, offering basic charting tools.
• MT5: Ideal for advanced analysis with features like additional order types, more timeframes, and market depth.
• cTrader: Popular for its fast execution and modern interface.
• Match-Trader: Designed for web and mobile users.

FundedNext allows traders to switch platforms before trading begins, though a $25 fee applies for switching to cTrader. FTMO, however, permits platform changes during the evaluation phase at no extra cost .

Trading Styles and Restrictions

The flexibility of trading strategies is another key differentiator between FundedNext and FTMO. Both firms allow discretionary trading, algorithmic strategies, and the use of Expert Advisors (EAs), but their rules and restrictions vary.

FundedNext offers considerable freedom, supporting strategies like martingale-based EAs, provided traders remain consistent across the Challenge and Funded Account phases. However, it enforces restrictions on certain practices, such as excessive margin use (over 70%), the Quick Strike Method, high-frequency trading (HFT), and copy trading between unrelated accounts.

FTMO takes a more structured approach. While it allows discretionary and algorithmic trading, it imposes stricter risk management rules. For instance, FTMO permits unrestricted news trading during the Challenge and Verification phases but prohibits Account holders (except Swing traders) from trading key news events like NFP, CPI, and FOMC announcements within a 2-minute window before and after the release . FTMO also monitors EA activity, flagging systems that exceed 200 orders at once or 2,000 positions in a day.

Both firms allow overnight and weekend trading during the Challenge and Verification phases, though Funded Account traders with FTMO must navigate restrictions around weekend market closures unless they are Swing traders.

Special Features and VPS Hosting

To enhance the trading experience, both firms provide additional tools and hosting solutions.

FundedNext sets itself apart with its AI assistant, Fundee, which offers instant multilingual support in English and 31 other languages. This feature is especially helpful for traders seeking quick assistance with platform features or account queries.

Both FundedNext and FTMO recognize the importance of VPS hosting for uninterrupted trading, particularly for automated strategies. QuantVPS, a specialized hosting solution, ensures ultra-low latency, 100% uptime, and compatibility with MetaTrader platforms. It also includes DDoS protection and automatic backups, making it a reliable option for algorithmic traders.

FTMO notes that while VPS services are generally allowed, U.S. nationals and residents face restrictions when accessing MetaTrader or cTrader platforms from U.S. geolocations. FundedNext does not impose such geographic limitations, offering greater accessibility for U.S.-based traders.

Additionally, FundedNext supports integration with Myfxbook, enabling traders to track their performance externally – a feature not specified for FTMO.

These features and tools significantly influence the overall trading experience, giving traders a range of options based on their needs and preferences.

Suitability for U.S. Traders

When it comes to U.S. traders, choosing between FundedNext and FTMO involves weighing a variety of factors like platform accessibility, evaluation methods, and overall cost structure. These considerations can significantly impact a trader’s experience and outcomes.

Flexibility vs. Structure

FundedNext stands out for its fast account progression and access to multiple platforms, with minimal geographic limitations. This makes it a strong choice for traders who rely on automated or algorithmic strategies. On the other hand, FTMO offers a more structured, phased evaluation process, which appeals to traders who prefer a gradual, risk-managed approach.

The two programs also differ in their account scaling methods. FundedNext focuses on rapid growth through its streamlined evaluation process, while FTMO emphasizes steady, controlled scaling with consistent risk management practices. These contrasting approaches naturally affect how traders recover costs and manage fees.

Cost Considerations

Cost is another key differentiator for U.S. traders. FundedNext often promotes itself as a budget-friendly option, especially for those looking for larger account sizes or a quicker path to funding. Meanwhile, FTMO highlights its lower upfront fees, which align with its structured evaluation process.

Additional costs, like VPS services, may come into play depending on geographic access and platform requirements. Policies around fee refunds and profit splits also vary, influencing both cost recovery and long-term profitability.

For U.S. traders, the choice often comes down to priorities. FundedNext is a better fit for those seeking flexibility, speed, and fewer geographic barriers. FTMO, with its structured progression and lower upfront costs, appeals to traders who prefer a more methodical approach. Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual trading strategies, technical needs, and risk management preferences.

Conclusion

After delving into the features and offerings of both platforms, it’s clear that FundedNext and FTMO cater to distinct trading styles and preferences. By 2025, each has carved out its own niche within the funded trading industry, adapting to the needs of their respective audiences.

Summary Table

This table provides a side-by-side comparison to help you identify the platform that best aligns with your trading style and goals.

Decision Guidance

For traders who prioritize speed, flexibility, and access to multiple platforms, FundedNext is a strong choice. Its quick evaluation process, flexible risk management policies, and support for dynamic trading environments make it particularly appealing for experienced algorithmic traders and scalpers. Additionally, U.S. traders may appreciate the fewer limitations regarding geographic restrictions.

On the other hand, FTMO is ideal for those who prefer a more structured and methodical approach. Its two-phase evaluation process is designed to build confidence and discipline over time. With lower initial fees and an emphasis on steady growth, FTMO is well-suited for beginners and traders with a more conservative outlook.

Both platforms represent the ongoing evolution of the funded trading industry, adapting their models to meet trader feedback and market trends. Your choice should ultimately reflect your trading experience, goals, and comfort with each platform’s evaluation process and risk management structure. Whether you gravitate toward FundedNext’s fast-paced flexibility or FTMO’s disciplined progression, both offer viable pathways to funded trading success.

FAQs

How do FundedNext and FTMO compare in terms of profit sharing and account growth options?

As of 2025, FundedNext stands out by offering profit splits of up to 95% for CFDs and 100% for Futures, with payouts processed in just 24 hours. In contrast, FTMO provides profit splits of up to 90% for CFDs, with payouts typically completed within 1–2 business days.

For account growth, FundedNext emphasizes flexible scaling options and quick access to funding. Meanwhile, FTMO caps its maximum account size at $200,000. Traders can scale their FTMO accounts after proving consistent performance and successfully completing evaluations. Both programs are designed to suit different trading goals and styles, so the best choice depends on what aligns with your individual needs.

What are the differences in the evaluation processes of FundedNext and FTMO, and which is better suited for beginner traders?

FundedNext provides multiple evaluation options, including 1-step, 2-step, and instant funding challenges, with account sizes tailored to traders of varying experience levels. In contrast, FTMO follows a standardized 2-step evaluation process with specific rules, such as a 3% maximum risk per trade and defined profit targets.

For newer traders, FTMO’s structured approach might feel more approachable, thanks to its clear guidelines and achievable targets. On the other hand, FundedNext’s range of flexible options could appeal to those seeking more control over their evaluation process. The decision ultimately hinges on the trader’s personal preferences and trading style.

What should U.S. traders keep in mind when comparing FundedNext and FTMO, especially regarding platform access and restrictions?

U.S.-based traders need to pay close attention to platform accessibility and any geographic restrictions when weighing their options between FundedNext and FTMO. As of 2025, FTMO does not accept clients from the United States, which means it’s not an option for U.S. traders. FundedNext, however, might have its own set of country-specific restrictions, so it’s crucial to confirm whether their services are available in the U.S. before moving forward.

To make the right decision, U.S. traders should double-check the legal availability of these platforms and ensure they align with their trading objectives and compliance needs. Staying updated on any changes to restrictions or policies can help avoid unnecessary complications.

Related Blog Posts

• FundedNext Customer Reviews: Is This Prop Firm Worth It?
• Top Prop Firms Compared: Spreads, Rules & Payouts (2025)
• Top Prop Firms That Support CFD Trading in 2025
• FTMO vs BrightFunded: Account Options and Rule Transparency Compared